Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

I was not seeking an apology; I was scoring points late at night. I shall consider carefully what the Minister said. He appeared to say that the state would be responsible under normal laws of negligence for negligence, and to that extent the amendment is not necessary. If I have got that wrong, I expect the Minister to put me right. There will be negligence. Some of us think that there might be quite a lot of it, but when there is negligence and a citizen suffers directly financially because of it, there is no reason on earth why due recompense should not follow in accordance with normal principles of law. If that is the case, maybe it is an unnecessary amendment, and I shall think about it before the next round.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1716 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Criminal records Biometrics Death Age Fraud Fingerprints ICT Eligibility Immigration controls Genetics Identity cards Gender Personal records Personation National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Personal names
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk