Proceeding contribution from Peter Luff (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on Business of the House.
Business of the House
Is it the hon. Gentleman's understanding, as it is mine, that the purpose of this business motion is to ensure that the subsequent debate and votes occur today? I wish that the Minister had confirmed that, but he would not do so. I would welcome that outcome. I support Crossrail in principle, but this instruction turns me against the whole thing because of its restrictive nature. I would like separate debates and votes on the separate issues.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 436 c1119
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Legislation
- Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:19:51 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281657
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281657
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281657