Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Northesk (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill 2005-06.


Identity Cards Bill

moved Amendment No. 86:"Page 40, line 17, after ““a”” insert ““full-face””" The noble Earl said: Taken literally, the drafting of sub-paragraph (a) could just as easily refer to a photograph of the back of an individual’s head and shoulders rather than the front. Clearly, this would not be conducive to obtaining a viable facial biometric.  The amendment seeks to deal with that point. There is also the subsidiary issue of whether, in technological terms, a full-face or other form of digitised facial biometric should be used. For example, I have it in mind that the United States favours quarter-face images. That said, I can accept that this level of detail is probably best left to subordinate legislation. Nevertheless, with that in mind, I suspect that Amendments Nos. 87 and 113, in the names of my noble friends Lady Anelay and Lady Seccombe, are more appropriate. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c975-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Biometrics Costs Convictions Delegated legislation Fraud EU countries Fees and charges Fingerprints Immigration EU law Identity cards Documents Fines Eyes Personal records Photographs National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk