Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill 2005-06.
Identity Cards Bill
Because I am trying to avoid red herrings, will the Minister clarify the commitment that he gave to the Committee earlier with regard to what the Government intend may now happen as a result of the debate on this group of amendments? Is he saying that the Government will go away and consider the drafting of subsection (5), or is he saying that they will go away, look at the drafting of subsection (5) and—taking into account the views that have been so strongly put forward by the Committee on the issue of convenience—come back with an amendment on Report that will put on the face of the Bill the fact that the convenience of the individual will be taken into account?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1037
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Biometrics Costs Convictions Delegated legislation Fraud EU countries Fees and charges Fingerprints Immigration EU law Identity cards Documents Fines Eyes Personal records Photographs National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:50:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285866
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285866
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285866