Proceeding contribution from Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2006.
Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2006
As someone who is undoubtedly interested in greater autonomy for Scotland, when I saw an SI with ““Devolution, Scotland””, written on it, I was excited. However, I can assure noble Lords that the disappointment is overwhelming, because the order is not about devolution at all. In fact, it is virtually the first supposedly devolution order that I cannot say I support because it is devolutionary in trend. It is not; it is a disappointing order, albeit pleasantly brief. The one legislative aspect that I should like to ask about is why the measure was not simply included in the Act or in the Bill. Why was this amendment to the Schedule to the Scotland Act not covered in the Bill itself? Why are we having to go through this process, given that it is not actually taking us anywhere?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1201
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Human rights Equality and Human Rights Commission Functions Non-departmental public bodies Scotland Reserved matters
- Legislation
- Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:42:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192