Proceeding contribution from Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Defence Industrial Strategy.
Defence Industrial Strategy
We have given that continual attention. I am musing on the word ““independent””. I am not sure what the hon. Gentleman means. Certainly I take responsibility as the person who, during the controversy about whether we should buy the C-17s, with Lord Gilbert was on the side of leasing C-17s. We believed that the operational capability of those huge aircraft overcame any objections that we should buy a less capable European alternative. We bought the C-17s and we are looking at buying more. As far as I can make out the RAF, whose morale will be flying a little higher than it was a few years ago, regard the C-17 as a great success. I forgot to mention it earlier. The independence of strategic airlift at European level is important. Some years ago it was identified as completely insufficient in the strategic defence review, so we tried to remedy that. We will continue to have a view on it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1478
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Ammunition Defence Armoured fighting vehicles Helicopters Procurement Military aircraft Repairs and maintenance Shipbuilding Warships Aerospace industry Submarines Guided weapons Unmanned air systems
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287133
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287133
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287133