Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Charles Kennedy (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 December 2005. It occurred during Ministerial statement on European Council.


European Council

As the Prime Minister knows, the Liberal Democrat party has consistently supported the enlargement of the EU and welcomes that development, which, following the collapse of the Berlin wall, is good for us in Europe and for the world generally. I acknowledge that that development must come with a financial price tag in order to meet moral, political and economic objectives. Having achieved a degree of expansion, we also welcome the opening of accession talks with Turkey and Croatia and the approval of candidate status for Macedonia in this presidency. Given the ideals that the Prime Minister properly set out at the beginning of the UK presidency, there is a great deal of disappointment with its conclusion, not least where common agricultural policy reform is concerned. First, is not the truth of the matter that the stitch-up between France and Germany over CAP reform, to which the Prime Minister had to put his name, that took place two years ago is what has made the British position so difficult today? Secondly, the French managed to call his bluff on the issue at the summit. The Prime Minister has said:"β€œβ€œand then to open up the prospect of a radically reformed Budget midway through the next Budget period.””" The French Foreign Minister has said that there will be no reform of CAP before 2013. Those two statements do not marry up. Will the Prime Minister confirm that when the much-vaunted review takes place, it will consist of a review by the Commission, which will result in a document being submitted to a subsequent Council of Ministers, which will decide the matter? The review carries no more force or persuasiveness than that. In terms of pursuing long-term British interests, albeit that this has been a somewhat disappointing presidency, does the Prime Minister agree that disengagement within the European Parliament or elsewhere is a recipe for absolute disaster? This at a time when someone is making speeches about pursuing a green environmental agenda; indeed, Europe is a very logical place to pursue that. In the last European Parliament, the British Conservatives held the chairmanship of the Environment Committee. If they pursue their current course of action, they will not hold the chairmanships of any committees. That will be a loss not only for them but for Britain. The outcomes of this summit are disappointing but not disastrous. It deserves to be particularly disappointing for those Eurosceptics who want to see Britain fragmented from Europe, rather than Europe succeeding in the longer term.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c1568-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
EU enlargement European Union EU budget EU economic policy Rebates Reform Common agricultural policy European Council
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk