Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
I am grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way. I hesitate to interrupt her flow, but she was arguing a minute ago that Clause 1(3) gives us what we need. She referred to the statutory purposes being a facilitation of providing a secure and reliable method of ascertaining facts. I hope she will accept, however, that there is a difference between ascertaining facts—where, I accept, Clause 1(3)(b) provides a secure and reliable method—and securing that information while keeping its use confidential. Since it is so important—organisations such as Liberty, Justice and the Law Society are all het up about it—what is the objection to making it crystal clear in the language of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1519-20
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Codes of practice Biometrics Costs Civil proceedings Intelligence services Identity cards Fines Public appointments Public interest National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration Technology Operating costs
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:30:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288192
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288192
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288192