Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
Of course he can ascribe a reason. That is why I said that the first letter will not give the person an appointment; it will invite him to make arrangements to make an appointment. The second letter provided for in the procedure is to remind the person of the need to report, to give a suggested appointment time and to say, ““If that is not convenient, can you notify us of another time?””. The second letter provides the person with an opportunity to rearrange the appointment, and the measure comes into play only if there has been no response to the initial notice followed by the reminder.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1539
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Codes of practice Biometrics Costs Civil proceedings Intelligence services Identity cards Fines Public appointments Public interest National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration Technology Operating costs
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:30:05 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288219