Proceeding contribution from Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
I do not wish to speak for any length of time. I am also interested in the case of international students and I echo the remarks made by the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick, and the noble Lord, Lord Dearing. I take on board what the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, said about considering student issues in relation to the second grouping, so I will not say much now. The best case, which applies particularly in relation to the point just made by the noble Lord, Lord Dearing, is that we should have an in-country appeals system. This is what I understand the first group of amendments to be about. From the point of view of those of us on these Benches, that would be a better solution than making exceptions, which is what, as I understand it, amendments in the second group do. Our preference would be for a good, clear answer on this first group of amendments.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c19GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Appeals Asylum China Fees and charges Families Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Health professions Entry clearances Married people Overseas students Refugees
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:31:17 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289420
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289420
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_289420