Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

As the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, said, my name is on Amendment No. 22. I am grateful for his support for that amendment, the purpose of which is to probe the scope of the meaning of ““dependant””—the person for whom appeal rights can be restored by regulations under new Section 88A(1)(b). It is unclear whether a spouse, fiancé, unmarried partner or civil partner would be regarded as a dependant. The heading in the current Immigration Rules is ““Family Members””, of which dependent relatives are a subset. I hope that that will be the case under the Bill, but I would welcome clarification of that. Amendment No. 22 includes a reference at the end to ““such other persons””; it would give the Secretary of State the power to prescribe those other persons by regulations simply because new categories sometimes appear, most famously in the case of civil partners.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c71GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk