Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
My noble friend was suggesting, not that the Government were trying to reintroduce the primary purpose by the back door, but that this clause gives the Secretary of State power to introduce whatever tests of the applicant’s intentions may come into his or her head. We are giving the Secretary of State enormous powers. Although they may not be used precisely to incorporate the primary purpose rule in the legislation, they could be used in ways that demand that the entry certificate officer look into what is in a person’s mind and not into the objective facts in the application.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c74GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:07:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290278
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290278
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290278