Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Carnegy of Lour (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.

Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

I may be being stupid about this, but the Minister said that the independent monitor would report six-monthly, to get the information quickly, and that what would be important was the quality of decision-making. I do not understand how the monitor will know the quality of decision-making in each place. If there is no appeal, what is there to look at? On what will she base the report? I may be muddling the matter. If someone asks to enter and entrance is refused, they cannot appeal. How does she know that that has been properly done?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c87GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk