Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
The reasons are recorded; I am not certain whether that is on a form, a tape or whatever. The way in which the decision is made is recorded and available. The monitor is looking at people who do not have an appeal, so the monitor will specifically take the information recorded from a random sample of people who were refused entry and look at how and why that decision was made, as both a trend across the system and in the individual posts that she visits. In that way, she will be able to identify areas of concern, or—I hope equally—areas of extremely good practice that can also be supported.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c88GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:45:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290295
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290295
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290295