Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

Am I right in thinking that the draft code just circulated by the noble Baroness is applicable to the clause we are now discussing? If it is, parts of it may assuage some of the anxieties just expressed by the noble Viscount, Lord Bridgeman. I am thinking in particular of paragraph 8 on page 9, where the employer does have a right of objection because the level of the penalty is too high. The Secretary of State is obliged to consider evidence provided of the employer’s financial circumstances in determining the objection. If that means that the fine imposed should not be such as to jeopardise the continuing existence of the business, perhaps it will achieve a part of what the noble Viscount seeks in some of his amendments. I hope that the noble Baroness can assure us that what is set out in the code will apply to the interpretation of Clause 16.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c127GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk