Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

This group of amendments includes Amendment No. 43, which we support. The Government talk of a ““fairer, faster, firmer”” system for immigration. To avoid any delay, it seems that it is right to look briefly at the purpose of this amendment. It would make explicit in the statute that written reasons for a decision on a notice of objection. We see no reason why that could not be done. An employer can submit a notice of objection to a penalty. Under Clause 16(5)(b) the Secretary of State must inform the employer of the decision on the notice of objection and if the employer is not satisfied with it, he is likely to proceed to an appeal in accordance with the provisions set out in Clause 17. The employer will have set out his case in the notice of objection. To narrow and best define the issues at appeal, and in appropriate cases to avoid the employer going to appeal altogether, it is sensible that the Secretary of State should set out his case in the decision on the notice of objection. Therefore the amendment appears wholly unobjectionable. I hope that the Minister will feel able to accept this amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c128GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Codes of practice Appeals Asylum Deportation Dependants Employment Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Entry clearances National security Marriage Pay Public appointments Overseas students Migrant workers Refugees Torture Independent Monitor of Entry Clearance Refusals
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk