Proceeding contribution from Dominic Grieve (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Government of Wales Bill.
Government of Wales Bill
At the risk of being pernickety, the wording of subsection (5), and the use of the expression"““the text need not be in both languages””," does not cover the possibility of the text being in Latin, because it is not one of the two languages specified? In those circumstances, the Minister would have to amend the legislation to say that the text does not have to be in either language, but some other?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 441 c1355
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Appeals Devolution Committees Legislative process Legislative competence Functions Electoral systems Ministerial powers Powers Members National Assembly for Wales Referendums Parliamentary scrutiny Politics and government Ministers Parliament Wales Supreme Court Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Government of Wales Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-21 13:28:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293882
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293882
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_293882