Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for her full and clear justification of the maintenance of the Bill as it stood. She chastises one with such elegance and charm that it is almost impossible to realise that one has been thoroughly flogged and has got nothing out of it, but there we are; that is the way. I suppose that the only thing about which I still have a strong residual sense is the appointment of the commissioner. This is a singularly sensitive appointment. The commissioner will have to delve into the interstices of the Civil Service and will have to make some strong judgments about the discharge of the Home Secretary’s responsibilities with regard to the registry and all its affairs. I therefore would have wished strongly for the appointment by the Crown to have been preserved, as the independence needs not only to be real but to be seen to be real. However, acting, as I believe that we have, with care and consideration for the primacy of the other place, we do not seek to oppose the proposals.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c583 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Databases Applications Costs Delegated legislation Fraud Fees and charges Enforcement Identity cards Information Documents National security Public appointments National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration Office of the Identity Commissioner Driving licences
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk