Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Anderson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Pensioner Travel (Tyne and Wear).


Pensioner Travel (Tyne and Wear)

I will try to be even more concise. My right hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, East and Wallsend (Mr. Brown) and my hon. Friend the Member for Tyne Bridge (Mr. Clelland) did not talk about the way in which the scheme applies to disabled people. It is perverse that the impact of free travel for disabled people, which was in the Budget, might well be that we find that the care bus service will be withdrawn from Tyne and Wear. Let me read from an e-mail that I received from a man living in my constituency who has severe problems due to muscular sclerosis. He wrote:"““No-one I speak to on the bus can actually believe that it will be stopped . . . as threatened—they cannot contemplate their lives without it. It is a mental torture for them to be worrying about losing their independence, when many already have enough to worry about with illness and disabilities . . . As our MP I hope you can let those with the power to solve this realise that they are not playing with pound signs, they are playing with the independence of already vulnerable people who deserve to be treated with respect & dignity—not left hanging on a thread of threats!””" That is what we are talking about with this cock up. We are talking about bus services that should be a real bonus for our people actually becoming a detriment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1271 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Bus services Concessions Fares Pensioners Local government finance Public transport Tyne and Wear
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk