Proceeding contribution from David S Borrow (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Animal Welfare Bill.
Animal Welfare Bill
Does my hon. Friend agree that there is a difference between tail docking and full tail amputation, and that those dogs that have their tails docked as puppies retain most of their tail? The advantage they get from having a tail in terms of wagging and balance is also largely retained. Those dogs that injure themselves and have the whole tail docked lose the whole of that advantage and are in a much worse position.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c1350
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Abuse Circuses Licensing Dogs Exemptions Domestic animals Internet Nature conservation Registration Sales Improvement notices
- Legislation
- Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:46:44 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307748
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307748
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307748