Proceeding contribution from Baroness Goudie (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
First, I know that the opinion on ““recklessness”” has reached the department, as I had a confirmation of that, and I will ensure that it receives a further copy. Secondly, I support all that the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, has said about auditing and box-ticking, because it will cause many more problems. I should like my noble friend to look at that again before Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 318A to 320 not moved.] On Question, Whether Clause 494 shall stand part of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c410-1GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Animal experiments Finance Liability Harassment Internet Shares Shareholders Vacancies
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:22:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308100
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308100
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_308100