Proceeding contribution from Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
I accept the noble Baroness’s point. However, there is an underlying difference of philosophy between us, as she rightly inferred. That will be apparent in some of the points that I shall come to. One philosophy states that someone should be listed in the register unless there are very compelling reasons why that should not be the case. However, I lean towards a very different philosophy and take a very different view. As I say, that may come up in later amendments. My view stems from a very different philosophy but I shall be happy to discuss it later. I completely take the noble Baroness’s point about secondary legislation—I am not looking for a specific response or anything in the Bill—in this regard.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c565-6GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Armed forces Administration Fraud Elections Electoral register Mental illness Pilot schemes Personation Multiple occupation Proof of identity Registration Students
- Legislation
- Electoral Registration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:44:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524