Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.


Electoral Administration Bill

When I sat down after my last intervention I was passed a note by a Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Treasury, at least that is what I think a Whip—in this case my noble friend Lord Evans of Temple Guiting—is called. The note is particularly interesting. It states:"““When I was running Faber & Faber I signed all the cheques and the bank had a list of 10 different signatures of mine””." That shows the scale of the problem that we are talking about. I asked my noble friend whether he minded if I read out the note and he seemed to assent. If the bank required 10 signatures for the cheques signed by my noble friend, what possible use would these signatures be as national identifiers if the system were ultimately rolled out throughout the United Kingdom? It seems to me that they are a waste of space, a waste of time and a waste of money.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c584GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Armed forces Administration Fraud Elections Electoral register Mental illness Pilot schemes Personation Multiple occupation Proof of identity Registration Students
Legislation
Electoral Registration Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk