Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

For the reasons I gave in relation to the last group of amendments, I cannot accept this amendment. It has the same vice—I do not use that word pejoratively; the same defect—as the amendment put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, in narrowing the people covered by the offence to those who are named as taking responsibility for the offer document. It even goes one stage further and removes the bidder from the scope of the offence as well. That is certainly not justifiable. As to the explanation given by the noble Lord that in a particular case the bidder might be a newco, and therefore not have a great deal behind it, I shall have to think how good an argument that is. In any event, it does not cover the totality of those who would be, in the words of the Bill,"““the person making the bid””," so I cannot accept this amendment or Amendment No. A149C.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c310GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk