Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
As the noble Lord said, this really does come back to our earlier debate. The amendment is a helpful illustration of what might have been provided if we had decided to go down a different legislative route. But having determined to go down the legislative route that we have taken, which I explained in answer to a previous amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, this is not the approach that we have adopted. We believe that the approach taken in the Bill provides greater flexibility for companies and their shareholders; therefore the amendment is inappropriate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c321-2GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:06:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313068
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313068
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313068