Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

As the noble Lord said, this really does come back to our earlier debate. The amendment is a helpful illustration of what might have been provided if we had decided to go down a different legislative route. But having determined to go down the legislative route that we have taken, which I explained in answer to a previous amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, this is not the approach that we have adopted. We believe that the approach taken in the Bill provides greater flexibility for companies and their shareholders; therefore the amendment is inappropriate.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c321-2GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk