Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. A180:"Page 322, line 4, leave out subsection (2) and insert—" ““(2)   The regulations— (a)   must, in the case of a company other than a Gibraltar company, require the company to register particulars if the company opens a branch in the United Kingdom, and (b)   may, in the case of a Gibraltar company, require the company to register particulars if the company opens a branch in the United Kingdom, and (c)   may, in any case, require the registration of particulars in such other circumstances as may be specified.”” The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. A180, I shall speak to Amendments Nos. A181, A184, A185 and speak in opposition to Amendment No. A182. The government amendment seeks to clarify the meaning of certain terms within Clauses 661, 664 and 665 and to alter the application of Clause 661 as regards Gibraltar companies. Amendment No. A181 inserts a definition of ““branch”” for the purposes of Clause 661. ““Branch”” must have the same meaning as in the 11th company law directive. Section 698 of the Companies Act 1985 achieves the same result by way of a definition, as, indeed, would Amendment No. A182, but in both cases, they use slightly more words. I therefore hope that Amendment No. A182 will not be pressed. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c337-8GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk