Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
As I hoped I had explained, it is there because at some stage in the future it may be desirable to use it. But I stress there is no current intention to use it and the Government believe it would be wrong to do so in the short term. Clause 681 agreed to. Clauses 682 and 683 agreed to. Clause 684 [Defective delivery]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c349GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Appeals Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Finance EU law Foreign companies Registration Shares Reform Shareholders Takeovers Takeover Panel
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:30:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313152
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313152
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313152