Proceeding contribution from Lord Turnbull (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
My Lords, I, too, recognise the good faith of my noble friend Lord Armstrong in moving this amendment. Since he is a predecessor but two of mine, I could not do anything else. Opt-outs have a long and honourable pedigree. The whole of our economic policy is currently based on one. Equally, I am not happy with a position in which, for an unnamed period, we have two kinds of passport in circulation: let us call them ““registered”” and ““unregistered””. My noble friend Lord Armstrong hinted at a possible solution. In moving the amendment, it was presented as though one change was being made from the previous proposal offered by the noble Lord, Lord Phillips; a change from opting in to opting out. In fact, two changes were made; the other being the removal of a time limit. The obvious question is whether there is a solution which combines the two effects—an opt-out and a time limit.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c660-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Identity cards Documents National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:14:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313200
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313200
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313200