Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Turnbull (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

My Lords, I, too, recognise the good faith of my noble friend Lord Armstrong in moving this amendment. Since he is a predecessor but two of mine, I could not do anything else. Opt-outs have a long and honourable pedigree. The whole of our economic policy is currently based on one. Equally, I am not happy with a position in which, for an unnamed period, we have two kinds of passport in circulation: let us call them ““registered”” and ““unregistered””. My noble friend Lord Armstrong hinted at a possible solution. In moving the amendment, it was presented as though one change was being made from the previous proposal offered by the noble Lord, Lord Phillips; a change from opting in to opting out. In fact, two changes were made; the other being the removal of a time limit. The obvious question is whether there is a solution which combines the two effects—an opt-out and a time limit.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c660-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Identity cards Documents National identity register Proof of identity Passports Registration
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk