Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

It is always a pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Buckingham (John Bercow), although I hope to be much briefer than he was to allow the Minister time to conclude this part of the debate. Members made important comments on the stigma that can attach to asylum seekers in the operation of a voucher scheme. My hon. Friend said that vouchers are vulnerable to fraud. That comment struck me, because if vouchers are vulnerable to fraud, cash is even more vulnerable. Indeed, asylum seekers dealt with under section 4 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, if they are in possession of cash, could become even more vulnerable. They could be preyed on by those who are aware that they have cash and who might seek to exploit that situation. In addition, this is an emotive and sensitive matter, as cash payments could be exploited by those wanting to stir up and magnify racist feelings in this country. A balance has to be struck in respect of the scheme’s operational practicalities. I think that it is right to keep cash out of the scheme, but the review of its operation should determine whether the anomalies pointed out by hon. Members of all parties arise. That is why I support amendment (b) to Lords amendment No. 18, tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Ashford (Damian Green), and not amendment (a).


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
444 c925-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Asylum Employment Housing Immigration controls Immigration Entry clearances Payments Voucher schemes
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk