Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Small Claims (Courts).


Small Claims (Courts)

: Yes, and we must recognise that there are existing execution methods, and as much as looking for new methods we would need to discuss the extent to which they are not adequately used. We should question the use of bailiffs and sheriffs and so forth, who have mixed effectiveness rates—that varies in different parts of the country. There is a great debate to be had on this issue. It is right to put the hon. Gentleman's point into the pot, and I would be grateful if the Minister addressed whether we can have such a debate, because it would be an important one. I apologise that my speech has taken so long, but these are important issues that deserve attention. Small claims are a valid, worthy and well-established part of our court system. Although I look forward to hearing the Minister's comments, so far I fail to see the evidence that the Government are giving this important area the attention it deserves. That is a shame—and possibly also a missed opportunity to extend access to justice.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
444 c359-60WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Courts Administration of justice Software Fees and charges ICT Enforcement Small claims
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk