Proceeding contribution from Brooks Newmark (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
What analysis the Minister has undertaken to justify that comment and to show what size the market will become after the Bill is enacted? What analysis has he undertaken to show that there is not a funding gap above £7 million or £8 million? Why has he chosen £7 million or £8 million as opposed to £10 million? I am curious as to what analysis the Government have made to make the decision that they are about to make.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1007
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:15:29 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319273
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319273
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319273