Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Precisely in the light of what the hon. Gentleman just said about the net cost to public funds of his overall package, and of the widespread uncertainty about whether the effects of his scheme will be exactly as he envisages, does he think this a very good test case of the appropriateness of the Government’s introducing a sunset clause? The provision would therefore automatically expire after a given period, whereupon we could judge who was right and what action did or did not need to be taken.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1009
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:36:14 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319282
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319282
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319282