Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
The hon. Gentleman may have a fair point, but perhaps the decision as to whether it is in the interests of a particular company to list on AIM—he may well be right that in many cases it will not be because certain investment managers will not invest in AIM-listed companies—should be left to the company itself, rather than necessarily including that matter in the rules. However, as I said, I would be interested to hear the views of the Economic Secretary. If we are considering REITs as a whole, one question that needs to be looked at in the longer term is whether we go further than listing on AIM and allow room for unlisted REITs. I know that the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors is looking at that as perhaps the next step. Again, I would be interested to know what the long-term views are.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1035
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:12:46 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319329
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319329
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319329