Proceeding contribution from Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
The definitions in the amendment mean that it would affect hundreds of thousands of people who do not live in settlements of 10,000. If the Government are to take seriously what the Chancellor has called the ““moral duty”” to tackle environmental change and make the polluter pay—in the direction of which the Finance Bill and Budget made the smallest possible gesture—it must be recognised that deprived and car-dependent households in sparsely populated and rural areas will be hit hardest by further changes to vehicle excise duty if the ““polluter pays”” principle is applied.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1052
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:12:50 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319357
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319357
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319357