Proceeding contribution from Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
The hon. Gentleman may not be overly familiar with Finance Bill procedures, but if he were, he would know that only a Minister of the Crown is entitled to have selected for debate an amendment that would raise revenue. Last year, my party tabled an amendment in respect of self-invested personal pensions—SIPPs. It could not be debated, but it was nevertheless the only Opposition amendment to be accepted completely by the Government. Before the hon. Gentleman gets too disparaging, I suggest to him that we might achieve the same success with our proposal to raise the higher rate of VED to £2,000.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1055
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:12:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319375
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319375
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319375