Proceeding contribution from John Healey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
I am disappointed in the hon. Lady. I did not accept the intervention of the hon. Member for Eastleigh (Chris Huhne), who gave his question to the hon. Lady to put to me. The question she poses, however, is a question for the clause stand part debate, not our debate on vehicle excise duty amendments. I do not accept that the Liberal Democrat amendments are desirable or workable. I do not accept that a principled case has been made for them. I believe that they would prove administratively complex and open to abuse. If pressed to the vote, I urge my hon. Friends to reject them.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c1069
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Assets Climate change Cars Concessions Finance Investment Income tax Excise duties Inheritance tax Property Transport Small businesses Shares Tax allowances Taxation Research Rural areas Real estate investment trusts Enterprise investment scheme Venture capital trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:12:02 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319421
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319421
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_319421