Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dubs (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, I give a broad welcome to Amendment No. 196, but if it had gone a little further, the amendments in the next group might not have been necessary. There are two points on which I would like to ask my noble friend for a little more information. In his introductory remarks, he used the words ““other than small companies””. What does he mean by that? My understanding is that the Government were talking about 1,500 companies, and I would have wished to argue that the scope of the amendment should have gone as far as 37,000 companies. That would still exclude the small ones but it would include the bulk of the companies to which this amendment would appropriately apply. Secondly, I endorse the comment from the Liberal Democrat Benches that it is a pity that Amendment No. 196 does not include reporting standards. Surely it would be desirable to have them, and I hope that my noble friend can give us some reassurance on that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c923 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Data protection Crime Charities Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Contributions Annual reports Fraud Finance Liability Donors Internet Pay Political parties Public companies Negligence Private companies Small businesses
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk