Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My Lords, before the noble Baroness formally withdraws the amendment, I did not say that there would not be a request or that information would not be sought. I was trying to explain that to satisfy the necessary and proportionate test could involve a significant engagement with significant resource issues. In some instances it may not be possible to gain the information necessary to make that judgment, if that were the key judgment which had to be made.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c982-3
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Data protection Crime Charities Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Contributions Annual reports Fraud Finance Liability Donors Internet Pay Political parties Public companies Negligence Private companies Small businesses
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:34:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320245
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320245
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320245