Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, the Government’s proposition does not rest on my experience of these matters. The people who are addressing it are considerably more up to date than I am. But I see no good reason, other than cost, for not giving those members and third parties access to the audit engagement letter. It might, as has been suggested, be a very dull and turgid document that few shareholders would choose to read, but should they not have the opportunity? Only yesterday, the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, was arguing vehemently for shareholder democracy. In Grand Committee, the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, said that engagement letters would tell you more about what the auditors are not going to do than what they are going to do, a point he has just reiterated. That is information to which investors should have access.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c1018 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Data protection Crime Charities Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Contributions Annual reports Fraud Finance Liability Donors Internet Pay Political parties Public companies Negligence Private companies Small businesses
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk