Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, perhaps I may offer support to the amendment. In a Bill which produced more than 1,000 amendments at Committee stage and, extraordinarily, more than 500 on Report, there are just two or three on which I have been lobbied—this is one of them—from people who feel simply disenfranchised, for the reasons that have been given. The Bill and its explanatory documents speak of shareholder rights. I want to recast the argument of shareholder responsibilities. As we move into a more complex world, the importance in our democracy of emphasising the stakeholding character of democracy will become ever more important. The drift is certainly towards more shareholdings being held in nominee accounts for the reasons that have been given, which is likely to continue. It seems to be unhealthy in a shareholding, stakeholding democracy to have ever increasing numbers of shareholders effectively disenfranchised from the decision-making processes. It seems to be just a healthy statement of shareholder responsibility, along with shareholder rights, that this amendment should be supported.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c818 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Animal welfare Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Finance Environment Investment Documents Harassment Ethics Foreign companies Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk