Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Patten (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am glad that the noble and learned Lord has given me the opportunity to respond to his direct request to me to give an example of what is new in a director having to face the job of a deciding whether to recommend a bid with a lower cash value. Paragraph (f) concerns,"““the need to act fairly as between members of the company””." Some members of the company might accept that my judgment was right if the board listened to the arguments and decided to go that way. Other members, such as the hedge funds represented through prime brokerages to which my noble friend Lord MacGregor referred, might say that I had not acted fairly in relation to their interests in regard to company X, because they wanted the short-term profits from the bigger cash bid. And hey-ho, off we go to the courts, aided by activist lawyers and prompted doubtless to decisions by activist judges.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c839 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Animal welfare Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Finance Environment Investment Documents Harassment Ethics Foreign companies Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk