Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

My Lords, that is exactly what I was going to say; it is funny that the noble Lord should say that. This concerns the concept of OFR, which has been raised. I think that my noble friend Lord Sainsbury will be dealing with that at a later stage. I therefore pass the baton deftly to him. If the noble Lord, Lord Clinton-Davis, will remain patient, he will hear the answer. I think I dealt last with Amendment No. 79F. I am sorry, it takes a few moments, but I should give a proper response to all the amendments, because powerful and important points have been made by my noble friends Lady Thornton and Lord Lea. Much that I said on the non-pre-empting amendments applies to Amendments Nos. 80 to 85 to the same effect. Amendment No. 87 is the last one to which I must particularly refer to, although if my noble friends think that I have not dealt properly with any of the other amendments, we will do so. Amendment No. 87 is distinct. I was not surprised that the noble Lord, Lord Freeman, supports it, given what had happened before. I am happy to recommit the Government to the publication of non-statutory guidance on the statutory statement of director’s general duties. I said that in Grand Committee, and am happy to repeat it here. We want to improve accessibility in this important area of financial activity, and I share the view of others that it would therefore be helpful to have guidance, playing a role in achieving that aim. I am also happy to give a commitment that the Government will consult on that guidance. I am therefore content to accept the substance of the amendment. I take issue with my noble friend simply on whether it is necessary to put it in statutory form. Having raised the point, and had those assurances from the Dispatch Box, I hope my noble friends will not think it necessary to press for an express statutory reference but, rather, to accept the promises that I have made on the Government’s behalf. I hope that covers the amendments that have been spoken to, and repeat my thanks for the important points made by others who contributed to the debate. I commend Amendment No. 79 to the House.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c852-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Animal welfare Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Finance Environment Investment Documents Harassment Ethics Foreign companies Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk