Proceeding contribution from Lord Freeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My Lords, I am grateful for that helpful response. I agree that the arguments I deployed and the precise point are not the same as those that we addressed in Grand Committee. The Movitex case, to which the noble and learned Lord referred, gives cause for concern in relation to the Clauses 159 and 160. However, I am grateful that the Government are prepared to consider whether there could be some technical improvements to this clause. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 90 not moved.] Clause 160 [Duty not to accept benefits from third parties]: [Amendments Nos. 91 and 92 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c866
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Accountability Charities Community interest companies Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Fraud Finance Families Liability Insolvency Harassment Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:02:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320636
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320636
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320636