Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 116:"Leave out Clause 220 and insert the following new Clause—" ““PROTECTED INFORMATION: RESTRICTION ON USE OR DISCLOSURE BY REGISTRAR (1)   The registrar must omit protected information from the material on the register that is available for inspection where— (a)   it is contained in a document delivered to him in which such information is required to be stated, and (b)   in the case of a document having more than one part, it is contained in a part of the document in which such information is required to be stated. (2)   The registrar is not obliged— (a)   to check other documents or (as the case may be) other parts of the document to ensure the absence of protected information, or (b)   to omit from the material that is available for public inspection anything registered before this Chapter comes into force. (3)   The registrar must not use or disclose protected information except— (a)   as permitted by section 221 (permitted use or disclosure by registrar), or (b)   in accordance with section 222 (disclosure under court order).”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I beg to move. [Amendment No. 117, as an amendment to Amendment No. 116, not moved.] On Question, Amendment No. 116 agreed to. Clause 221 [Permitted use or disclosure by the registrar]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c877 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Contracts Accountability Charities Community interest companies Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Fraud Finance Families Liability Insolvency Harassment Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk