Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 141:"Page 112, line 32, at end insert—" ““(2A) If it appears to the court that the application and the evidence produced by the applicant in support of it do not disclose a prima facie case for granting it, the court— (a) must refuse the application, and (b) may make any consequential order it considers appropriate. (2B) If the application is not refused under subsection (2A)— (a) the applicant must serve the application on the company, (b) the court— (i) may make an order requiring evidence to be produced by the company, and (ii) may adjourn the proceedings on the application to enable the evidence to be obtained, and (c) the company is entitled to take part in the further proceedings on the application. (2C) On hearing the application,”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 247 [Granting of leave]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c890-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Accountability Charities Community interest companies Company law Companies Directors Animal experiments Fraud Finance Families Liability Insolvency Harassment Public companies Private companies Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:02:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320692
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320692
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320692