Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
I am sure that it would be down to the enforcement authorities, which we shall discuss under Clause 10, to have their own administrative arrangements for how they operate in their area. I do not want to spend—indeed, waste—a lot of the Committee’s time speculating on how, in different parts of the country, fixed-penalty notices may or may not be administered under the Bill. When enforcement authorities are in place, it will be for them to ensure that the law is enforced, and a range of actions that they can take will be set out in the Bill and in delegated legislation. I understand the noble Lord’s concerns, but I suspect that at the beginning, when fixed-penalty notices were first introduced, people thought that civilisation would end. Civilisation has not ended, and fixed-penalty notices have been a methodology for reducing the burdens on courts and used very effectively to secure desirable social outcomes in a number of areas, including traffic. Clause 9 agreed to. Schedule 1 [Fixed penalties]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c6GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Age Hospitals Fixed penalties Health hazards Fines Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Powers of entry MRSA Working conditions Sales Young people Shipping Smoking Territorial waters
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:43:48 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321377
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321377
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321377