Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.


Health Bill

I am sure that it would be down to the enforcement authorities, which we shall discuss under Clause 10, to have their own administrative arrangements for how they operate in their area. I do not want to spend—indeed, waste—a lot of the Committee’s time speculating on how, in different parts of the country, fixed-penalty notices may or may not be administered under the Bill. When enforcement authorities are in place, it will be for them to ensure that the law is enforced, and a range of actions that they can take will be set out in the Bill and in delegated legislation. I understand the noble Lord’s concerns, but I suspect that at the beginning, when fixed-penalty notices were first introduced, people thought that civilisation would end. Civilisation has not ended, and fixed-penalty notices have been a methodology for reducing the burdens on courts and used very effectively to secure desirable social outcomes in a number of areas, including traffic. Clause 9 agreed to. Schedule 1 [Fixed penalties]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Codes of practice Age Hospitals Fixed penalties Health hazards Fines Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Powers of entry MRSA Working conditions Sales Young people Shipping Smoking Territorial waters
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk