Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
I would go slightly further than my noble friend. I think that not only did no Member of this Committee, apart from the Minister, mention the possibility of age 21, I do not think that that issue was ever raised in the other place when this clause was accepted with cross-party support. I stand to be corrected on that, as I need to read Hansard. It has certainly never been mentioned to me up to this point. I am grateful to the Minister for what he has undertaken to do. He will realise that, as Members of the Committee have said, this issue has a number of serious dimensions to it which bear close scrutiny. We cannot proceed any further with it now, but without question we will have to return to this matter at a later stage. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. On Question, Whether Clause 13 shall stand part of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c28GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Age Hospitals Fixed penalties Health hazards Fines Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Powers of entry MRSA Working conditions Sales Young people Shipping Smoking Territorial waters
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:43:22 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430