Proceeding contribution from Robert Smith (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
The clause includes the word ““or””. The amendment seeks to replace that with ““and””. With the ““or”” still in place we can remove any burden but we do not have to remove overall burdens. The overall burden can increase. As I have said, there is an ““or””. The Minister can say that he is removing a burden even though there is an increase in overall burdens. There is still compliance as things stand.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c782
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration Costs Business Delegated legislation Juries EU law Government departments Legislation Law Commission Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Powers Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Small businesses Regulation Reform Trials Taxation Legislative reform orders
- Legislation
- Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:11:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668