Proceeding contribution from Bridget Prentice (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
I, too, welcome the comments made by the hon. Member for North-East Hertfordshire (Mr. Heald). I am always happy to enter into dialogue with him, and happy to restate that if it helps this evening’s debate. However, that does not mean that I have any intention of withdrawing new clause 21. There are times when the accelerated procedures that the right hon. Member for East Yorkshire (Mr. Knight) has clearly outlined are not appropriate for substantive changes to the law, as opposed to consolidating Bills. I ask him to reflect on that point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c810
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration Costs Business Delegated legislation Juries EU law Government departments Legislation Law Commission Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Powers Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Small businesses Regulation Reform Trials Taxation Legislative reform orders
- Legislation
- Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:21:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323737
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323737
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323737