Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nick Gibb (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 June 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on State Schools (Independence).


State Schools (Independence)

In response to the intervention from the hon. Member for Taunton (Mr. Browne), my comments related to what would happen if we abolished the national curriculum, which I am totally against. To take up my hon. Friend’s point about whether Ministers can determine matters, I am not saying that central Government can or indeed should prescribe everything that happens in schools; what I am saying is that Ministers can determine the content of national curriculum documents that emanate from the Department for Education and Skills. My understanding, from what I have experienced in my current role and as an MP for nine years, is that too often Ministers from both parties have not been engaged in the detailed minutiae of what emanates from the Department. We live in a democracy, where accountability rests here, so it is important that Ministers should have detailed knowledge of the issues and be engaged in them. An incoming Conservative Government would take that view. I am afraid that there are too many documents currently emanating from the Department that do not reflect the wishes of Ministers, the public or the party in power.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c34WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Admissions Curriculum Charitable trusts Local education authorities Public sector Schools
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk